Throughout the three parts of the literacy narratives, I believe it is fair to say that a large majority of the learning targets within the course have been tackled. Firstly, regarding rhetorical composition, we focused on making our works in written and drawn formats. Writing out the essay versus compiling it into a comic format checks the box for the rhetorical composition aspect of the course learning objectives. More personally, the literacy narrative process helped me tackle the second learning target. When moving from one part of the literacy narrative to the next, I had to constantly summarize, analyze, and synthesize my own works to improve them and transition between modes of composition. It helped me refine my own argument in a way. The third part of the literacy narrative especially targeted writing as a process. I consider the second part of the literacy narrative, turning our narrative into a comic, as part of that process. It was part of revising, editing, and reflecting on my work. Finally, the second part of the literacy narrative directly targeted the fourth course objective of visual thinking in a hands-on manner.
Returning to my alphabetic narrative after creating my comic was difficult. Throughout the making of my comic, I realized there were a lot of details that were unimportant that I needed to cut out. Transitioning back into the alphabetic narrative, it was difficult to cut out those parts. After cutting out the parts as well, I now had to resynthesize the story and make it all work together, which involved a full restructuring of my essay for me.
My analytical thinking process has become more centered towards detail, and specifically unnecessary details, which I have become self-aware of within my works. Although it’s definitely a problem that I’ll have to continue fixing and tackling, it is a way in which I see my story in a completely different lens now.
Click
here to return to the narrative.