Open post

Week Ahead: 5

5 9/23
  • Stitches — “A few years ago I had the following dream. In the dream I was a boy of six again” (274-329)
  • Hillary Chute, “Comics for Grown-Ups” from Why Comics?: From Underground to Everywhere
Sketch 4: Combophoto
9/25

For Tuesday, you have a short chunk of Stitches to read. We’ll spend a lot of class on Tuesday discussing Hillary Chute’s chapter “Comics for Grown-Ups.” Chute is probably the foremost academic authority on comics these days — she’s the Distinguished Professor of English and Art + Design at Northeastern University in Boston and has published many books of criticism on comics as a medium.

The first twenty pages of her article provide a very useful overview of the history of comics with lots of useful information in it. But in class on Tuesday, we’ll focus most of our attention on the last 10 pages of the essay, the section called “Reading Comics,” which provides us key terms and a theoretical framework for understanding how comics works and how to read and analyze them.

On Thursday, we’ll focus on the beginning of Spinning, starting off that discussion by comparing Walden’s graphic narrative to David Small and to Allie Brosh.

Tillie Walden won the very prestigious Eisner Award for Spinning when it was published in 2018, when she was 22 years old. Spinning, which again was published when she was 22 years old, was Walden’s fourth graphic narrative book. In the five years since Spinning was published she has published eight more books (to be totally fair, two of those are forthcoming later this year). You can read all of her fifth book, On a Sunbeam online here — it’s worth at least glancing through some of those pages to get a sense of where her style has gone since Spinning.

We’ll start with how Walden establishes character and setting compared to Small and how her tone/visual style is similar and different to Small’s. How does Walden use the page, panels, and gutters in comparison to Small? Note that there is one small moment in Spinning where Walden shows herself holding a copy of Stitches, so she has signaled for us that Small’s text is an influence for her — how has it influenced her as a writer?

Open post

Week ahead: 4

4 9/16
  • Stitches — rest of “I was six” and “I was eleven” (64-156)

Two Tribes Book Talk by Emily Bowen Cohen. 4pm @ Jones Room (Level 3) of the Woodruff Library

Sketch 3: Visual Note Taking
9/18
  • Stitches — “I was fourteen” & “I was fifteen” (157-273)

Emily Bowen Cohen is an award-winning author and engaging public speaker known for powerful storytelling that explores complex identities. She is Jewish and a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation, and she creates comics that explore cultural intersectionality. She will be visiting Emory on Tuesday afternoon to talk about her new book, Two Tribes: Real Life Stories of a Jewish Native American, on Tuesday afternoon at 4pm in the Jones Room on the 3rd floor of Woodruff Library.

I strongly recommend that you attend her talk if at all possible. If you attend and then write a reflection post on your site then I will give you extra credit towards your final grade. Describe the event briefly and write about connections you observe between her talk and the discussions we’ve been having as a class or whatever parts of Cohen’s talk you find especially interesting.

We’ll focus our discussions during week four on working through Stitches, following Small’s life from ages 6 to 15. Pay attention to the way pages are laid out and to what you are expecting as you read versus moments where you are surprised.

Open post

Week Ahead: 3

3 9/9
9/11
  • note: 9/10 College add/drop/swap deadline
  • Individual conferences begin

For Tuesday, you should have published your Literacy Narrative essay as a page on your site. You should also have published your reflection post and sketch 2.

In class on Tuesday, we’ll spend a lot of class time on Randy Olson’s ABT thesis structure. You should be able to skim the Olson essay fairly quickly — the key idea is understanding the (bad) deductive structure that Olson describes and then his suggestion for improving it by utilizing a (good) inductive structure instead. I’ll post a student essay that I received in the past and we’ll spend a chunk of time in class with a hands-on activity restructuring that student’s argument into the ABT structure.

We’ll also look at two chapters from Unflattening by Nick Sousanis, who drew the book as his dissertation for Teachers College at Columbia University — it was the first comics dissertation ever and has since been published by Harvard UP and has won a bunch of awards. Sousanis took a job at San Francisco State University a couple of years ago and is building a comics studies program there.

Unflattening will serve as one of the theoretical frameworks for our analyses of comics. Be aware that this comic is quite a bit more dense reading than Brosh’s web comic or than you’ll find Stitches to be, so give yourself a little extra time to work through those 20 pages carefully. I’ll start off our discussion of Sousanis by asking you to consider how effective Unflattening is as an academic, philosophical argument. (Soon we’ll read another theoretical framing text, but in the form of a more traditional essay by Hillary Chute and I’ll ask you to consider how the two pieces are similar and different.) How do the words and images in Unflattening interact together?

We’ll spend most of our time in class on Thursday discussing the reading from Stitches, starting with the following questions:

  • Pick the single page that you find the most compelling or interesting or that you think is the most important in today’s reading. Describe the page in a few sentences. Why is it interesting or important?
  • How does Small establish character and setting in the introduction?
  • This chapter all takes place while David is 6 years old. What are the major subdivisions of the chapter though? You’ll probably decide that there are three (maybe four) major sections in these pages — what is the primary idea being conveyed by each section?
Scroll to top